Share:


Integrating sustainability into supplier selection: a grey-based TOPSIS analysis

    Chunguang Bai Affiliation
    ; Joseph Sarkis Affiliation

Abstract

Sustainable supplier selection plays an important role in sustainable supply chain management operations and implementation. In this paper a novel formal modeling approach is conceptually developed and presented to address sustainable supplier selection. Grey theory and TOPSIS, a distance based multiple criteria method, are used for the integration and evaluation of sustainable supplier performance for sustainable supplier selection. From a research perspective, TOPSIS is improved to more effectively deal with grey numbers by integrating a degree of likelihood rather than converting grey numbers into crisp numbers functions, and it provides more flexible supplier rankings. This methodology strengthens the sustainable supplier selection process, and can be applied to other multiple criteria decision making problems. Illustrative calculations are made using data on sustainable supplier selection and evaluation published by Bai and Sarkis (2010). The technique is relatively accurate, matching well with results from a published grey rough set approach. The methodology easily implementable with minimal complex calculations required. It can also provide support for sustainable supplier selection, benchmarking, and improvement decisions. This is one of the first papers to integrate a broad set of sustainability factors for grey-based TOPSIS and supplier selection.

Keyword : supply chain management, multiple criteria evaluation, supplier selection, performance evaluation, grey set theory, TOPSIS

How to Cite
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection: a grey-based TOPSIS analysis. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(6), 2202-2224. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.5582
Published in Issue
Nov 21, 2018
Abstract Views
2004
PDF Downloads
1324
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Ahmadi, H. B., Petrudi, S. H. H., & Wang, X. (2017). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of telecom industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(9-12), 2413-2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9518-z

Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029

Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013

Awasthi, A., & Kannan, G. (2016). Green supplier development program selection using NGT and VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.11.011

Bai, C., Dhavale, D., & Sarkis, J. (2016). Complex investment decisions using rough set and fuzzy c-means: an example of investment in green supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.059

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.023

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2012). Supply-chain performance-measurement system management using neighbourhood rough sets. International Journal of Production Research, 50(9), 2484-2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.581010

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2013). A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.011

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Improving green flexibility through advanced manufacturing technology investment: modeling the decision process. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 86-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.013

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2018a). Integrating and extending data and decision tools for Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection. Computers & Operations Research, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.06.005

Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2018b). Evaluating complex decision and predictive environments: the case of green supply chain flexibility. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(4), 1630-1658. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2018.1483977

Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872-3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040

Chan, F. T. S. (2003). Performance measurement in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(7), 534-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700300063

Chatterjee, K., & Samarjit, K. A. R. (2018). Supplier selection in Telecom supply chain management: a Fuzzy-Rasch based COPRAS-G method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 765-791. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2017.1295289

Deng, J. L. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1(1), 1-24.

Fallahpour, A., Olugu, E. U., Musa, S. N., Wong, K. Y., & Noori, S. (2017). A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.005

Fallahpour, A., Amindoust, A., Antuchevičienė, J., & Yazdani, M. (2017). Nonlinear genetic-based model for supplier selection: a comparative study. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 23(1), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1189461

Gauthier, C. (2005). Measuring corporate social and environmental performance: the extended life-cycle assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3416-x

Genovese, A., Lenny Koh, S., Bruno, G., & Esposito, E. (2013). Greener supplier selection: state of the art and some empirical evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 51(10), 2868-2886. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.748224

Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009

Junior, F. R. L., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014). A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014

Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy Axiomatic Design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.076

Kumar, A., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014a). A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega, 42(1), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.003

Kumar, D. T., Palaniappan, M., Kannan, D., & Shankar, K. M. (2014b). Analyzing the CSR issues behind the supplier selection process using ISM approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 92, 268-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.005

Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., & Claasen, S. J. (2005). Environmental and social impact considerations for sustainable project life cycle management in the process industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.76

Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078

Mahdiloo, M., Saen, R. F., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: an extension and application of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.010

Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: an emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025

Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.125

Sarkis, J., & Talluri, S. (2002). A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00117.x

Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: a triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.007

Shahryari Nia, A., Olfat, L., Esmaeili, A., Rostamzadeh, R., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2016). Using fuzzy Choquet Integral operator for supplier selection with environmental considerations. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4), 503-526. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1194315

Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016). Sustainability in multi-tier supply chains: understanding the double agency role of the first-tier supplier. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001