DEA-based composite index for innovation-integrated human development performance assessment of countries
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2025.24915Abstract
The Human Development Index (HDI) introduced by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) offers a unique quantitative measure that encompasses advancements in three fundamental aspects of human development: health, education, and living standards. However, focusing on only three dimensions when evaluating human development performance of countries is not adequate in today’s digital world. This study proposes a data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based composite index to provide an innovation-integrated human development performance assessment tool for countries. The novel two-stage common-weight DEA-based approach proposed in here is applied in a case study examining the performance assessment of European Union (EU) countries. The first stage of the developed methodology consists of solving the novel commonweight DEA-based approach with HDI indicators as the outputs and the Gini coefficient as the input. At the second stage, innovation-based indicators from World Bank database are used to evaluate innovation efficiency of EU countries. The composite index that yields the complete ranking of EU countries in terms of innovation-integrated human development performance is computed as the product of the efficiency scores resulting from these two stages. The rankings produced by the proposed approach are compared with the HDI rankings as well as the results obtained from various common-weight DEA-based models.
First published online 27 November 2025
Keywords:
human development, composite index, performance assessment, data envelopment analysis, common-weight DEA-based approachHow to Cite
Share
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Au, A. (2024). How do different forms of digitalization affect income inequality?. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(3), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20562
Blancard, S., & Hoarau, J.-F. (2013). A new sustainable human development indicator for small island developing states: A reappraisal from data envelopment analysis. Economic Modelling, 30, 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.016
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Conceião, P. (2019). Human development and the SDGs. UNDP. Retrieved December 12, 2023, from https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-and-sdgs
Despotis, D. K. (2005). A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(8), 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601927
Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Keshavarz Eshkalag, M. (2019). Sustainability assessment of OPEC countries: Application of a multiple attribute decision making tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, Article 118324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118324
Erpolat Tasabat, S., & Morais, D. (2019). A novel multicriteria decision-making method based on distance, similarity, and correlation: DSC TOPSIS. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article 9125754. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9125754
Goker, N., Karsak, E. E., & Dursun, M. (2022). An integrated QFD and common weight DEA-based fuzzy MCDM framework for performance ranking of countries. Social Indicators Research, 159, 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02751-2
Hatefi, S. M., & Torabi, S. A. (2010). A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.014
Hatefi, S. M., & Torabi, S. A. (2018). A slack analysis framework for improving composite indicators with applications to human development and sustainable energy indices. Econometric Reviews, 37(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2016.1140286
Kabakci Gunay, E., & Topbas, F. (2021). Impact of income distribution inequality on the human development index: Panel data analysis for BRICS countries. The Academic Elegance, 8(17), 247–257.
Karsak, E. E., & Ahiska, S. S. (2005). Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection. International Journal of Production Research, 43(8), 1537–1554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528160412331326478
Karsak, E. E., & Ahiska, S. S. (2007). A common-weight MCDM framework for decision problems with multiple inputs and outputs. In O. Gervasi & M. L. Gavrilova (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 4705. Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2007 (pp. 779–790). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74472-6_64
Karsak, E. E., & Goker, N. (2020). Improved common weight DEA-based decision approach for economic and financial performance assessment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(2), 430–448. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.11870
Łącka, I., & Brzezicki, Ł. (2022). Joint analysis of national eco-efficiency, eco-innovation and SDGS in Europe: DEA approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(6), 1739–1767. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17702
Mariano, E. B., Ferraz, D., & de Oliveira Gobbo, S. C. (2021). The human development index with multiple data envelopment analysis approaches: A comparative evaluation using social network analysis. Social Indicators Research, 157, 443–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02660-4
Mavi, R. K., Mavi, N. K., Saen, R. F., & Goh, M. (2022). Common weights analysis of renewable energy efficiency of OECD countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, Article 122072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122072
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.). Income distribution database. Retrieved December 12, 2023, from https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?tm=DF_IDD&pg=0&snb=1&vw=tb&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_WISE_IDD%40DF_IDD&df[ag]=OECD.WISE.INE&df[vs]=&pd=2010%2C&dq=.A.INC_DISP_GINI..._T.METH2012.D_CUR.&ly[rw]=REF_AREA%2CUNIT_MEASURE&ly[cl]=TIME_PERIOD&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false
Paraschiv, D. M., Manea, D. I., Țițan, E., & Mihai, M. (2021). Development of an aggregated social inclusion indicator. Disparities in the European Union on inclusion/exclusion social determined with social inclusion index. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(6), 1301–1324. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.15103
Ramsey, P. (1989). Critical values for spearman’s rank order correlation. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14(3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986014003245
Reig-Martínez, E. (2013). Social and economic wellbeing in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin: Building an enlarged human development indicator. Social Indicators Research, 111, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0018-8
Sayed, H., Hamed, R., Ramadan, M. A.-G., & Hosny, S. (2015). Using meta-goal programming for a new human development indicator with distinguishable country ranks. Social Indicators Research, 123, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0723-6
Sayed, H., Hamed, R., Hosny, S. H., & Abdelhamid, A. H. (2018). Avoiding ranking contradictions in human development index using goal programming. Social Indicators Research, 138(2), 405–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1663-8
Shi, C., & Land, K. C. (2021). The data envelopment analysis and equal weights/minimax methods of composite social indicator construction: A methodological study of data sensitivity and robustness. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16, 1689–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09841-2
Shi, Z., Wu, Y., Chiu, Y. H., Shi, C., & Na, X. (2022). Comparing the efficiency of regional knowledge innovation and technological innovation: A case study of China. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(5), 1392–1418. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.17125
Tofallis, C. (1997). Input efficiency profiling: An application to airlines. Computers & Operations Research, 24(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(96)00067-6
Toloo, M. (2015). Alternative minimax model for finding the most efficient unit in data envelopment analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 81, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.032
Tunsi, W., & Alidrisi, H. (2023). The innovation-based human development index using PROMETHEE II: The context of G8 countries. Sustainability, 15(14), Article 11373. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411373
United Nations Development Programme. (n.d.). Human Development Index (HDI). Retrieved December 12, 2023, from https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI
United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Human development report 2021/2022: HDI technical notes. Retrieved December 12, 2023, from https://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2021-22_HDR/hdr2021-22_technical_notes.pdf
United Nations Development Programme. (2022). Human development report 2021/2022: Uncertain times, unsettled lives: shaping our future in a transforming world. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2021-22
World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank Open Data. Retrieved January 10, 2024, from https://data.worldbank.org
View article in other formats
CrossMark check
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.